Thesis Week 6 – Part 2

 - by cathcw

Seeking Advice…

As part of preparations for our upcoming midterm presentations on Monday March 8, we were instructed to speak to three people who were knowledgeable in our subject area.  I had already spoken to Clay a few weeks ago in detail to discuss the outline of the project.  Last weekend I ran Tom Glaiyser at the Digital Media and Policy conference at Columbia’s School of Public Policy.  Tom is a Knight Media Policy Fellow at the New America Foundation with expertise in media policy reform.  We met when I first presented Noisy Idiots at NYU’s Participation Camp at ITP last summer.

I asked him about:

a) people/papers on analysis of group conversations; and

b) possible research methodologies I should be implementing to investigate Noisy Idiot behavior on the 10 websites I am studying.

Tom came back with a raft of great resources to look at including:

  • Marc Smith (newsgroup analysis) – specifically, I’m getting hold of his Communities in Cyberspace book.
  • Warren Sack (known for his work on the analysis of very large scale conversations (VLCS), I’m going to begin with his paper on discussions in an Open Source Software community)
  • Martin Wattenberg (Visual Communication Lab at IBM Research) and Fernanda Viegas’ work on Wikipedia

In addition Tom gave some helpful suggestions on how to analyze behavior in online conversations, he also mentioned already existing tools such as DISQUS and INTENSE DEBATE, and that the slashdot/DailyKos style of moderation is more widely available.

Thanks Tom!

Thesis – Week 6 Part 1

 - by cathcw

Places to look for discussion

Thank you thesis class for the suggestions today in class for where to look for lively discussion.  This week I’ll be looking at:

  • DMCworld.com – discussions around DJ-ing and the World DJ Championships
  • World of Warcraft forums – worldofwarcraft.com
  • Additionally – World of Warcraft wikis: wowwiki.com – information on WoW
  • Urban Baby and Park Slope Parents
  • 4Chan – does anonymity result in Noisy Idiot behavior or lead to trolling?
  • Chowhound.com for foodie discussion
  • Stuy Town/Peter Cooper Village/Atlantic Yards – sites discussing proposed real estate development issues/residents committees
  • Streetsblog.org
  • Victims of Bernie Madoff groups
  • Wall Street bonuses discussion groups.

There’s a lot to be looking at there, and am now confident the 10 groups I’ll be studying will be suitably diverse in their subject matter.  The main issue I had last week was finding groups with lively discussions that were not just groups about political issues.  In addition there is enough variety in the level of moderation of these site for my studies.  Final list coming and a research plan coming soon….

Thesis – Weeks 3/4/5

 - by cathcw

Week 3 – Discussion with @cshirky

This week I discussed with @cshirky my concept to attempt to undertake some actual experiments and testing for this project.  I realized having spoken to him, that this was quite an ambitious idea to execute in just 12 weeks.  It takes longer than this for behavior to change, and I need time to research tweaks, ideas, concepts to integrate into already-existing group rules, before I even reach the testing stage.

Instead, he suggested picking 10 diverse discussion groups/forums.  Observe them, find trends, and look for patterns.  Having done that, I’d be in a position to present a detailed study of behavior patterns within online groups.  This idea appeals to me, specifically choosing 10 diverse groups, my aim is present research that people from many different sectors would find useful.  Also – from a interest point of view, it makes it fascinating for me to research.  Feedback from the class indicated this was a good change in tack, with the additional suggestion of finding a ‘control group’ where there is lively debate, discussion, decision making that takes place successfully.

Week 4

I took the NY State Bar Exam this week – sadly no Noisy Idiots time, just torts, evidence, crim pro etc.

Week 5

The selection of ten groups to study is well underway and will be presenting them in class tomorrow. The list is subject to change.  I want to select groups from a variety of subject areas such as politics, music and the arts.  I also attempted to pick groups with a variety of control mechanisms – some requiring registration, some heavily moderated – others not.  Any suggestions for other groups to study would be very much appreciated.

Tea Party Patriots

This is a fascinating group to study, the Tea Party is in the press a lot recently following Sarah Palin’s appearance at National Tea Party Convention in early February.  According to an article in the Economist on February 11, where “Much of the Nashville event was devoted to teaching the fired-up newbies practical skills, such as using Facebook and Twitter to spread the word, raise money and get out the vote … “  I anticipate lots of group discussions aimed at working together, to make decisions and reach consensus from grass roots Tea Party Groups.

Debate Europe

I want to revisit this group I studied initially for the first Noisy Idiots Dilemma paper.  Specifically because it is an example of a heavily moderated forum, with strict user registration requirements, with a substantial amount of single-issue Noisy Idiot behavior.  I’d also like to see if anything has changed there since this time last year.

Music Discussion

An example of where people seem to get along – a harmonious community, how do they do it?  Is it because subject matter is really not contentious?  I’d like to explore further.

White House 2

Jim Gilliam’s site, with very novel ways of optimizing group discussion, an example of people attempting to reach consensus on issues, with very effective moderation techniques – having spoken to Jim he’s a knowledgeable resource on dealing with Noisy Idiots.

Not Yet Ascertained Open Source Program Forum

I’m currently reading Steven Weber’s The Success of Open Source, and very much want to study an open source programing forum, however I need some advice from some techie-er members of the class than me,  @thomasrobertson, will be speaking to you tomorrow!  Open source program communities are quite unique in how they work together to build something and refine it – and they evolve in ways that are fascinating in terms of group interaction online.  They’ve also been around for a while.  This linux forum is an example.

Final thoughts:

In the next week, I anticipate finalizing the ten groups and complete the proposed analysis model to use.

Awesome Update

 - by cathcw

Awesome Foundation NYC awarded their first grant!

Awesome NY have made their first selection!  It was tough NY – you completely blew us away with amazing incredibly brilliant ideas.

But – this month, for our inaugural grant, we’ve picked a LASER TWEEZER that makes amoebas eat bacteria.

Awesomeness to the MAX.

No – really, its a laser tractor beam that prods amoebas.  We’ve awarded January’s $1000 grant to Ben Dubin-Thaler’s Cell Motion BioBus.

We celebrated with Ben at the First AF-NY Award Ceremony on Monday February 8. The BioBus was there too, and Ben’s intern from the Frances Perkins Academy in Brooklyn who will be working on the project.  We had a great evening.  Elizabeth Fuller covered the event – pictures and report here.

More on the BioBus:

The BioBus is a mobile science laboratory. Students on board explore the world around them with research-grade microscopes, and make their own discoveries under the guidance of professional scientists.  The BioBus has proven to be an innovative, effective, and attention getting vehicle for science education. Ben has been named “New Yorker of the Week” by New York One and have been recognized in regional, national, and international press for this innovative approach to bridging the “science achievement gap.” A laser tractor beam will be an awe-inspiring addition to the BioBus’ repertoire of excitement generating yet sophisticated tools and experiments.

We’ll let Ben do the talking, here’s his original proposal:

“How many projects are part lightsaber and part Magic School Bus combined into an awesome science adventure? First, I will build a laser tractor beam on board my BioBus. Then, during normal BioBus school visits, students and teachers from underfunded schools in the Bronx and across the country will perform their own experiments by poking, prodding, and perturbing cells using the tractor beam. I will document and publish the construction process in an open-source science education journal, allowing schools and science nerds around the world to build tractor beams of their own.

Every time someone uses the laser tractor beam to hold a bacterium still while they produce a movie of cell division, and then feeds those bacteria to a ravenous amoeba, they will have no other choice but to blurt out, “Awesome!” With extensive experience building laser tractor beams and as founder of the BioBus mobile science lab, I am the only person in the world prepared to do something this awesome.

I started the Cell Motion BioBus two years ago after finishing my Ph.D. at Columbia University. While at Columbia, I built two different laser tractor beam systems (a.k.a. laser tweezers) for my research on cell move, one of which is currently used in the undergraduate physics lab. After graduating with honors and building the BioBus, over 10,000 students at 50 schools across NYC and the country have come aboard our hands-on, high-tech, microscope lab and computer classroom. I’ve been told the introductory video on the BioBus website, http://www.biobus.org, is pretty awesome, so you might be interested in checking that out. Do-it-yourself experiments like building an economical laser tractor beam is possible because of breakthroughs in inexpensive, powerful diode lasers (e.g. skylasers.com).”

Ben will also publish his protocol for building a cheap laser tractor beam via the open-source PASTE project journal.

MY LEGS, DOWNFALL AND SPARERIBS

 - by cathcw

Are the mnemonics to remember bits of New York Practice, specifically, MY LEGS: contracts that are important so you have to write them down to be valid, eg the M, is for marriage, and secondly, the grounds for a CPLR 3211 pre-answer motion to dismiss an action (DOWNFALL) and the corresponding affirmative defenses (SPARERIBS – apparently bar exam favorites are the two s’s: Statute of Frauds and Statute of Limitations).

This has been my life pretty much since December 21, when I sat down to day 1 of bar review lectures. Since then, I’ve been to class for about 3 and a half hours of lectures every day, memorized, and memorized until I was at one point contemplating just eating the note cards, written essays, done hundreds and hundreds of multiple choice questions and outlined, summarized and highlighted. And now its over.

This is also the first time I have sat at my desk, in the morning with a coffee, watching the snow fall – when I have not felt like I should be memorizing something.

Its lovely.

That’s not why I’m writing this post though – to bore you with the details of bar review. In England, we don’t have a bar exam. You go to law school, take exams there and then practice for 2 years, in a law firm, under close supervision, completing a sort of baby-lawyer skills syllabus, attending training, and being paid half the salary of an associate – after those 2 years have passed, if you haven’t screwed up, you are admitted to the Roll of Solicitors and get a big pay rise.

All the law exams you do though are within the academic institution you are part of, so there is no coming together like I was part of over the last 2 days, of everyone in the area, to take the same exam. Last week I saw my therapist, and he made the comment along the lines of “wow – how strange, all those people, in one place, all.wanting.to.be.lawyers.” I didn’t twig at the time what he meant. But yesterday, as I was surrounded by hundreds – probably thousands of other people, all having gone through years of law school, months of bar review, from all over NY and farther afield, nervously shuffling into the exam room, smiling, commenting on why we were doing this again, I got what he meant. Its a shared identity. Ok – a shared identity that everyone makes jokes about, but it is an identity.

I’m glad for that.

Am realizing I’m a bit of a solitary fish: am quite separated from my family, I live in a different country to the one I was born in and I’m doing a degree where I don’t do a lot of the stuff everyone else does, am certainly not the person to ask what to do with an Arduino. A novel outsider perhaps. But yesterday, I felt I was with my tribe. Disheveled and tired as we were. I felt I belonged. Not bound together by the fact we’d swallowed the same amount of facts over the last 2 months, or been to law school – something more than that, I get the same feeling when I’m at home with my friends from the law firm, or this summer working at a law school – our minds work a certain way, through a barrage of training yes, but also a natural inquisitiveness, and desire to solve problems, a pedantic rigor to delve to the very heart of something, and discernment to take a broader view. Being a lawyer is part of my identity, and I’m beyond glad for that, when so much else shifts and changes. Its very solid, tangible, I worked for it and I have been changed by it.

So MY LEGS, SPARERIBS AND DOWNFALL ASIDE, having a proctor actually IN THE BATHROOM, honor codes, being blasted over loudspeakers, wristbands, being herded like sheep, suppressing panic attacks for over a week now – was all worth it. Pass or fail. It was worth it.

The second reason for writing this post, in case you are still with me here after my ode to the legal profession, is that, I learned a lot about my adopted home doing all this studying. The obvious bits yes: the Constitution – due process, equal protection, the Bill of Rights, Miranda, search and seizure – its a long list. That’s not what I meant though. What I meant is that I learned, that, well, why I moved here – that Americans are really, really nice people. Clearly not all of them. But – my taxi driver the other day wishing me the best luck, the lady in the rest room with amazing shoes who also wished me best luck, my bar man at my local restaurant, Ross who gave me a glass of wine on him last night, the proctors in the exam, who smiled and told me “they” (I think the NY State Bar Examiners) “wanted us to pass, and not to worry” – all of them nice, kind, friendly, encouraging. Not to mention my professors who have high-fived me, taken me to tea, listened to me wail about the Non-Resident Motorist Statute, and my friends (who think I’m nuts for doing this at the same time as doing ITP – and who are completely right) – who still have been seen with me in public despite roots in my hair that quite frankly should be a misdemeanor.

People are friendly and warm and nice here, yes – even in NYC. In England too, but we’re less expressive en mass I think, especially to strangers.

That’s my review of bar review. Now I can get back to a life without latches, mandamus to compel, res judicata, conversion – incidentally, the conversion of a dog hypo (law professor leaping around yelping “NO – I DO NOT MEAN THE DOG IS NOT AN EPISCOPALIAN – THE DOG IS DEAD!) is something that will, make me laugh forever. Thanks BarBri.

Where’s Diego?

 - by cathcw

In bed.

Of course, where else would anyone be at nearly 11.30 pm on a Saturday night?

ITP Bed

Diego.  In bed.

Watching the Simpsons.  Projected above his head.

This bed though is in the middle of the ITP floor.  I am not sure why it is there.  People crash on it during the day.  It used to be Mustafa’s Bed_Data project for Rest of You originally I think.  Last night though, I found Diego, curled up, watching an episode of the Simpsons being projected above his head.  Do you think it’ll catch on in all grad schools?

Thesis – Week 2

 - by cathcw

This week we were tasked with reviewing the thesis proposals of two other people in the class.

My “Two for Review” were Fiona’s concept for interactive fiction and Thomas’ Banyan Speak, a system to allow comments to traverse between applications.  At this stage, being in a class with such variety of ideas doesn’t fox me, but it does make me sit up for a second or two and wonder how this will affect our concept development?  ITP is such a truly interdisciplinary environment.  I’ve written a thesis before – using a program that models the dehydration of rocks.  It was such a great experience working in a lab.  Seems years ago. I was in a Chemistry department, with physical chemists.  We were all chemists or programmers though, all doing the same sort of work.

This thesis is different, and I wonder if a large part of this will be due to just how our ideas will be affected by each other?  Fascinates me.

Demand Question Time

 - by cathcw

Demand Question Time

Having grown up watching and listening to the familiar jousting and debating of PMQs, I am throwing my support behind the cross party group campaigning to introduce a similar system here.

Parliamentary debate is a hugely effective way to engage all sides of the political spectrum in rigorous dialog, and is an intensely public way of  holding political leaders in check.  There’s no better BS detector for us than to see our leaders dodge, fluff or fumble when being questioned.  Of course, the system has its downsides, discussions can be reduced to a series of theatrical quips and jabs, but overall, the system is a highly effective method of enabling debate between politicians and their keeping their overall accountability to the electorate firmly in the public view.

Since the petition was launched two days ago, it has hauled in over 12,000 signatures, and on Wednesday, was discussed Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton during the White House daily briefing.  Despite him saying that at the moment, a regular Question Time was not in the offing, the fact that the issue is being address seriously by the White House is a great step.  David Corn, the man who asked the question about Question Time to Bill Burton has more here.  Spontaneous rallying calls such as this one are refreshing to see.  Keep up the good work.

Details of Demand Question Time and the petition here.

Tweeting here.

The Law Cares Not For Trifles….

 - by cathcw

Copyright & Cyberlaw

Class 2: February 3rd – Fair Use & Remix Culture

Molotov Man

Molotov – Joy Garnett

Sometimes there are topics that make your brain turn loops, fizz, and fall over.  The rights of artists to protect their work, in the form they created it, balanced against the rights of other artists to mash-up, re-invent and progress the bounds of art is one of those topics.

We discussed the Meiselas-Garnett controversy at length last year in Comm Lab.  My colleague Lee-Sean Huang wrote a thoughtful post arguing that it was in fact the subject of the art, Pablo Arauz that had really been ignored.  He wasn’t asked how his image was used.  Am not sure how far this argument can run given the number of people depicted in art works.  However, his point, its “not about you” in reference to both artists did pull the discussion up to a cloud-eye view of the rights that people have when something of them is in a piece of art – whether initial creator, subject or re-mixer.

photo

From “Nicaragua” Susan Meiselas

How do you make sense of copyright laws?  This week’s reading bombarded us with cases, theories and real life issues.  To me its pretty clear cut.  There are two main reasons for copyright:

  • to allow authors to profit from their work (and not those who didn’t do the work)
  • to protect authors from having their work changed to something they didn’t intend it to be

The first one seems pretty fair, and I argued this last year in Comm Lab.  Argument as follows: “I made something, I put time and effort into producing it, I want to reap the financial rewards from my work.” Ok – that seems fair to me.  And the argument that other people do not deprive someone of the profits from  a piece of work that can be replicated, eg software, doesn’t wash with me.  Loss of profits from the nth sale of a good, will still deprive the author of income if it is replicated.

What if there’s no money?

This is the juicy issue.

The Sonny Bono Act extended copyright terms, allowing the owners of work to benefit from longer copyright ownership, the well cited example being Disney and Mickey Mouse.  But what about sweeping up works that are no longer commercially valuable, yet still copyrighted, and putting them into the public domain, just like Eldred?  This is a different issue.  This is about access to works.  Is a copyright commons the answer?

The idea of a commons as discussed in the Rimmer piece is particularly interesting now that it is 4 years out of date.  His concern that the concept of Creative Commons might not work with those outside the legal world (“non-legal actors”) will be fun to discuss in class this evening given I suspect that a roomful of non-legal actors will be sitting there, most of them with CC licenses on their Flickr photo collections.  How do we judge the success of an alternative form of copyright?  Specifically, is the key indicator of its success the number of avoided litigation suits, or is it the increase in legal remixing, or finally, can its success be measured simply by its widespread use?

An alternative to traditional copyright was sorely needed at the time Lessig met Eldred, and also when Garnett got the letter from Meiselas’ lawyers.  We’ve got one with quite a large user-base now compared to then.  But CC is currently still an opt-in system.  It is not an overhaul of the legal copyright system as a whole.  All good reforms however, begin with the adventurous few, grow to the open minded early-adopters, until the people in control start to take notice.  I think that is definitely going on now in the copyright field at the moment.  Thank you Lessig.